Open Innovation: A Bibliometric Study

Nader Ale Ebrahim, Yii Bonn Bong

Abstract


Open Innovation” activities are of crucial importance in the Research and Development (R&D) department, especially for survival among enterprises in the competitive nature. There has been an increasing interest in “Open Innovation”. However, the rate of interest has yet to be measured by publications trends. This study aims to demonstrate the trends of “Open Innovation” from 2012 to 2017 and highlight the key-phrases for the selected topic. In this bibliometric study, a total of 3,567 publications were investigated in the SCOPUS database using SciVal platform. The concept of “Open Innovation” has received considerable attentions since 2003, and the highly cited paper was published by Chesbrough. The top 50 key-phrases by relevancy indicated the importance of “Open Innovation” and other emerging research areas, giving a guideline for future research.


Keywords


Bibliometric study; Open innovation; Citations analysis; Top cited papers; Research trends

Full Text:

PDF_ahead

References


Aghaei Chadegani, A., Salehi, H., Yunus, M. M., Farhadi, H., Fooladi, M., Farhadi, M., & Ale Ebrahim, N. (2013). A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases. Asian Social Science, 9(5), 18-26. doi:10.5539/ass.v9n5p18

Ahmed, A., Mastura, A., Ghafar, N. A., Muhammad, M., & Ale Ebrahim, N. (2016). Impact of Article Page Count and Number of Authors on Citations in Disability Related Fields: A Systematic Review Article. Iranian Journal of Public Health, 45(9), 1118-1125. doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.3979656.v1

Akhavan, P., Ale Ebrahim, N., Fetrati, M. A., & Pezeshkan, A. (2016). Major trends in knowledge management research: a bibliometric study. Scientometrics, 107(3), 1249-1264. doi:10.1007/s11192-016-1938-x

Ale Ebrahim, N., Ahmed, S., & Taha, Z. (2008, 17th, 18th and 19th of November). Virtual Environments Innovation and R&D Activities. Paper presented at the International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation (ICERI 2008), Madrid, Spain.

Ale Ebrahim, N., Ahmed, S., & Taha, Z. (2009). Innovation and R&D Activities in Virtual Team. European Journal of Scientific Research, 34(3), 297-307. doi:10.1.1.174.5790

Ale Ebrahim, N., Salehi, H., Embi, M. A., Habibi Tanha, F., Gholizadeh, H., & Motahar, S. M. (2014). Visibility and Citation Impact. International Education Studies, 7(4), 120-125. doi:10.5539/ies.v7n4p120

Ale Ebrahim, N., Salehi, H., Embi, M. A., Habibi Tanha, F., Gholizadeh, H., Motahar, S. M., & Ordi, A. (2013). Effective Strategies for Increasing Citation Frequency. International Education Studies, 6(11), 93-99. doi:10.5539/ies.v6n11p93

Bong, Y. B., & Ale Ebrahim, N. (2017). Increasing Visibility and Enhancing Impact of Research. Asia Research News, aid/10634(cid/1), 1-3. doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.4903073.v1

Bong, Y. B., & Ale Ebrahim, N. (2017). The Rise of Alternative Metrics (Altmetrics) for Research Impact Measurement. Asia Research News, aid/10563(cid/6), 1-3. doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.4814215.v1

Borrego, Á. (2015). Measuring compliance with a Spanish Government open access mandate. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, n/a-n/a. doi:10.1002/asi.23422

Chesbrough, H., & Crowther, A. K. (2006). Beyond high tech: Early adopters of open innovation in other industries. R and D Management, 36(3), 229-236. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00428.x

Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). The era of open innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(3), 35-41.

Chow, D. S., Ha, R., & Filippi, C. G. (2015). Increased Rates of Authorship in Radiology Publications: A Bibliometric Analysis of 142,576 Articles Published Worldwide by Radiologists Between 1991 and 2012. American Journal of Roentgenology, 204(1), W52-W57. doi:10.2214/ajr.14.12852

de Paulo, A. F., Carvalho, L. C., Costa, M. T. G. V., Lopes, J. E. F., & Galina, S. V. R. (2017). Mapping Open Innovation: A Bibliometric Review to Compare Developed and Emerging Countries. Global Business Review, 18(2), 291-307. doi:10.1177/0972150916668600

Elsevier. (2017). About SciVal. Retrieved from https://www.elsevier.com/solutions/scival

Ergul, S., Ardahan, M., Temel, A. B., & Yildirim, B. O. (2010). Bibliometric review of references of nursing research papers during the decade 1994-2003 in Turkey. International Nursing Review, 57(1), 49-55.

Farhadi, H., Salehi, H., Yunus, M. M., Aghaei Chadegani, A., Farhadi, M., Fooladi, M., & Ale Ebrahim, N. (2013). Does it Matter Which Citation Tool is Used to Compare the h-index of a Group of Highly Cited Researchers? Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 7(4), 198-202. doi:arXiv:1306.0727

Garfield, E. (1955). Citation indexes for science - new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science, 122, 108 - 111.

Garfield, E. (1972). Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science, 178, :471-479.

Gholizadeh, H., Salehi, H., Embi, M. A., Danaee, M., Ordi, A., HabibiTanha, F., . . . Osman, N. A. A. (2014). Economic Growth and Internet Usage Impact on Publication Productivity among ASEAN’s and World’s Best Universities. Modern Applied Science, 8(5), 169-178. doi:10.5539/mas.v8n5p169

Godoy, D., Zunino, A., & Mateos, C. (2015). Publication practices in the Argentinian Computer Science community: a bibliometric perspective. Scientometrics, 102(2), 1795-1814. doi:10.1007/s11192-014-1450-0

Haga, T. (2005). Action research and innovation in networks, dilemmas and challenges: two cases. AI & Society, 19(4), 362-383. doi:10.1007/s00146-005-0327-4

Haustein, S., Costas, R., & Larivière, V. (2015). Characterizing Social Media Metrics of Scholarly Papers: The Effect of Document Properties and Collaboration Patterns. PLoS ONE, 10(3), e0120495. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0120495

Hirsch, J. (2007). Does the h index have predictive power? PNAS, 104, 19193 - 19198.

Jamali, S. M., Md Zain, A. N., Samsudin, M. A., & Ale Ebrahim, N. (2015). Publication Trends in Physics Education: A Bibliometric study. Journal of Educational Research, 35, 19-36. doi:10.5281/zenodo.801889

Jang, H., & Kim, H. (2014). Research output of science, technology and bioscience publications in Asia. Science Editing, 1(2), 62-70. doi:10.6087/kcse.2014.1.62

Kazakis, N. A. (2015). The research activity of the current faculty of the Greek chemical engineering departments: a bibliometric study in national and international context. Scientometrics, 103(1), 229-250. doi:10.1007/s11192-014-1523-0

Kim, Y., Horta, H., & Jung, J. (2015). Higher education research in Hong Kong, Japan, China, and Malaysia: exploring research community cohesion and the integration of thematic approaches. Studies in Higher Education, 1-20. doi:10.1080/03075079.2015.1036850

Kovács, A., Van Looy, B., & Cassiman, B. (2015). Exploring the scope of open innovation: a bibliometric review of a decade of research. Scientometrics, 104(3), 951-983. doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1628-0

Moed, H. F., & Glänzel, W. (2004). Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research: The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Nagaratnam, S., Ale Ebrahim, N., & Habibullah, M. S. (2016). A Bibliometric Analysis on "Fertility Rate" Research Trends. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 1(1), 1-14. doi:10.5281/zenodo.58318

Patterson, M. S., & Harris, S. (2009). The relationship between reviewers' quality-scores and number of citations for papers published in the journal Physics in Medicine and Biology from 2003-2005. Scientometrics, 80(2), 343-349. doi:10.1007/s11192-008-2064-1

Rakhshandehroo, M., Yusof, M. J. M., Ale Ebrahim, N., Sharghi, A., & Arabi, R. (2015). 100 Most Cited Articles in Urban Green and Open Spaces: A Bibliometric Analysis. Current World Environment, 10(2), 445-455. doi:10.12944/CWE.10.2.08

Randhawa, K., Wilden, R., & Hohberger, J. (2016). A Bibliometric Review of Open Innovation: Setting a Research Agenda. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 33(6), 750-772. doi:10.1111/jpim.12312

Schulz, A. C., & Nicolai, A. T. (2015). The Intellectual Link Between Management Research and Popularization Media: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Harvard Business Review. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 14(1), 31-49. doi:10.5465/amle.2012.0397

Seguí-Mas, E., Signes-Pérez, E., Sarrión-Viñes, F., & Vidal, J. A. (2016). Bibliometric analysis of the international literature on open innovation and absorptive capacity. Intangible Capital, 12(1), 51-72. doi:10.3926/ic.685

Winter, J. F., Zadpoor, A., & Dodou, D. (2014). The expansion of Google Scholar versus Web of Science: a longitudinal study. Scientometrics, 98(2), 1547-1565. doi:10.1007/s11192-013-1089-2

Yu, T., Yu, G., & Wang, M. Y. (2014). Classification method for detecting coercive self-citation in journals. Journal of Informetrics, 8(1), 123-135. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2013.11.001

Zhai, L., Yan, X., Shibchurn, J., & Song, X. (2014). Evolutionary analysis of international collaboration network of Chinese scholars in management research. Scientometrics, 98(2), 1435-1454. doi:10.1007/s11192-013-1040-6

Zoller, F. A., Zimmerling, E., & Boutellier, R. (2014). Assessing the impact of the funding environment on researchers' risk aversion: the use of citation statistics. Higher Education, 68(3), 333-345. doi:10.1007/s10734-014-9714-4

Zyoud, S. H., Al-Jabi, S. W., & Sweileh, W. M. (2015). Worldwide research productivity of paracetamol (acetaminophen) poisoning: A bibliometric analysis (2003-2012). Human & Experimental Toxicology, 34(1), 12-23. doi:10.1177/0960327114531993


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




In.J.Innovation (IJI) e-ISSN: 2318-9975

 

Licença Creative Commons
Este obra está licenciado com uma Licença Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional.