Success Factors of Radical Breakthgrough ICT Projects – Comparison of Hardware and Software Cases

Jari Sarja

Abstract


Because technology pushed product development projects are risky and failure rates are high, the success factors are valuable knowledge for the management of development-intensive firms. This paper provides a comparison of success factor weighting between hardware and software product development projects in the ICT industry improving existing success factor research. We analyze qualitatively interview data from nine intentionally selected start-up firms and identify which success factors were clearly supported by HW and SW firms, and in which area different types of firms could benchmark each other. The practical aim of this paper is that it helps management to recognize the real actions needed to reduce product development risks in HW and SW projects.


Keywords


New product development; NPD; technology push; radical innovation; success factor; content analysis; quantification

Full Text:

PDF

References


Balachandra, R. & Friar, J. (1997). Factors for success in R&D projects and new product innovation: A contextual framework. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 44(3), 276-287.

Brosnan, M. (1998). Technophobia: The psychological impact of information technology. Routledge, New York.

Burns, N. & Grove, S.K. (1997). The practice of nursing Research. Conduct, critique & utilization. W.B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia.

Christensen, C. (1997). The innovator’s dilemma: when new technologies cause great firms to fail. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Cooper, R. & Kleinschmidt, E. (1995). Benchmarking the firm’s critical success factors in new product development. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 12(5), 374-391.

Davis, F. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.

Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550.

Elo, S. & Kyngäs, H. (2007). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107-115.

Ernst, H. (2002). Success factors of new product development: A review of the empirical literature. International Journal of Management Reviews, 4(1), 1-40.

Eskola, J. & Suoranta, J. (2008). Johdatus laadulliseen tutkimukseen. Vastapaino, Tampere. (in Finnish).

Graneheim, U.H. & Lundman, B. (2003). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24(2), 105-112.

Green, S., Gavin, M. & Aiman-Smith L. (1995) Assessing a multidimensional measure of radical technological innovation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 42(3), 203-214.

Herstatt, C. & Lettl, C. (2004). Management of ‘technology push’ development projects. International Journal of Technology Management, 27(2-3), 155-175.

Kotler, P. & Armstrong, G. (1987). Marketing – An Introduction. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.

Ledwith, A. & Coughlan, P. (2005). Splendid isolation: Does networking really increase new product success? Creativity and Innovation Management, 14(4), 366-373.

Lewitt, T. (1960). Marketing myopia. Harvard Business Review, 38(4), 45-56.

McDermott, C. & O’Connor, G. (1995).

Managing radical innovation: An overview of emergent strategy issues. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19(6), 424-438.

Peteraf, M. & Bergen, M. (2003). Scanning dynamic competitive landscapes: A market-based and resource-based framework. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 1027-1041.

Polit D.F. & Beck, C.T. (2004). Nursing Research: Principles and Methods. Philadelphia, JB Lippincott Company.

Rockart, J.F. (1979). Chief executives define their own data needs. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 81-93.

Runeson, P. & Höst, M. (2009). Guidelines for conducting and reporting case study research in software engineering. Empirical Software Engineering, 14(2), 131-164.

Samli, A.C. & Weber J.A.E. (2000). A theory of successful product breakthrough management: Learning from success. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 9(1), 35-55.

Sandelowski, M. (1995). Qualitative analysis: What it is and how to begin? Research in Nursing and Health, 18(4), 371-375.

Sarja. J. (2014). Success factors of breakthrough technology push projects in ICT context. Licentiate thesis. University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.

Sarja, J. (2015). Key factors of successful technology push projects in the ICT context: a review of the literature. International Journal of Information Technology and Management. 14(4), 253-273.

Sarja, J. (2015b). Explanatory Definitions of the Technology Push Success Factors. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 10(1), 204-214.

Sarja, J. (2016). Developing technology pushed breakthroughs: Defining and assessing success factors in ICT industry. Doctoral thesis. University of Oulu. Tampere, Juvenes Print.

Sarja, J., Saukkonen, S., Liukkunen, K. & Annanperä, E. (2017). Developing Technology Pushed Breakthroughs: An Empirical Study. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, submitted manuscript.

Tseng, H. & Chen, W. (2004). A replacement consideration for the end-of-life product in the green life cycle environment. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 24(11), 925-931.

Tuomi, J. & Sarajärvi, A. (2003). Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällönanalyysi. Gummerus, Jyväskylä. (in Finnish).

Ulrich, K.T. & Eppinger, S.D. (2008). Product Design and Development. Irwin/McGraw-Hill.

Yin, R.K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage Publications, Los Angeles.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Int. J. Innov. e-ISSN: 2318-9975

Rua Vergueiro, 235/249 - Liberdade, São Paulo - SP (Brasil), Cep: 01504-000

Licença Creative Commons
Este obra está licenciado com uma Licença 
Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-CompartilhaIgual 4.0 Internacional