Process Innovation: a surfing manufacturer case study

Isabel Cristina Scafuto, Ana Claudia Belfort, Gislaine Teixeira, Emerson Antonio Maccari

Abstract


Companies tend to adopt formal methods of product innovation, reinventing business processes to improve their speed and efficiency. Although the economic impact of process innovations is as relevant as the introduction of new products or services, this subject is often neglected in the general innovation literature. Aiming to contribute to scientific discussions, this study provides empirical evidence of process innovation by small businesses and its implications from the recent innovation theory perspectives (Un & Asakawa, 2015; Suárez-Barraza, 2013, O'Reilly & Tushman, 2004; Harmon, 2015). Classified as qualitative and exploratory research, it was conducted as a study method at a Brazilian company that manufactures surfing equipment. The main results demonstrate that incremental and architectural innovations co-occur. Furthermore, because they are effectively implemented, they require business process changes. The findings show that an integrated and adequate combination of the different types of innovation tends to contribute to the improvement of business results.

Keywords


Process Innovation; Innovation Continuum; Surf Industry

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abernathy, W. J., & Utterback, J. M. (1978). Patterns of industrial innovation. Technology Review, 80(7), 41-47.

Adams, R., Bessant, J., & Phelps, R. (2006). Innovation management and measurement: A review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 8 (1), 21–47.

Almeida et al. (2012). A evolução histórica da prancha de surf e seu aperfeiçoamento tecnológico. EFDeportes.com - Revista Digital. Acesso em 29 de Julho de 2015, disponível em http://www.efdeportes.com/

Ayhan, M. B., Öztemel, E., Aydin, M. E., & Yue, Y. (2013). A quantitative approach for measuring process innovation: a case study in a manufacturing company. International Journal of Production Research, 51(11), 3463-3475.

Banco Nacional de Desenvolvimento Econômico e Social. (30 de Julho de 2015). Classificação de Porte da Empresa. Fonte: http://www.bndes.gov.br: http://www.bndes.gov.br/SiteBNDES/bndes/bndes_pt/Institucional/Apoio_Financeiro/porte.html

Carvalho, A. C. B., & Mondo, T. S. (2010). O valor das ondas: um estudo de caso sobre a Praia do Campeche- Florianópolis na perspectiva de surfistas, moradores e visitantes. Revista Eletrônica Patrimônio: Lazer & Turismo, 7(10), 75-98.

Choi, J. N., and J.Y. Chang. (2009). Innovation implementation in the public sector: An integration of institutional and collective dynamics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94 (1), 245–253.

Costa, E., Cabral, J. E., Forte, S. H., & Costa, M. P. (2016). Patterns of technological innovation: A comparative analysis between low-tech and high-tech industries in Brazil. International Journal of Innovation, 4(2): 97-111. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5585/iji.v4i2.101

Crossan, M., & Apaydin, M. (2010). A multi-dimensional framework of organizational innovation: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Management Studies, 47(6), 1154–1191.

Damanpour, F. & Gopalakrishnan, S. (2001). The dynamics of the adoption of product and process innovations in organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 38(1), 45–65.

Damanpour, F., Walker, R., & Avellaneda, C. (2009). Combinative effects of innovation types and organizational performance: A longitudinal study of service organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 46 (4), 650–75.

Davenport, T. H. (1993). Process innovation: reengineering work through information technology. Harvard Business Press.

Douglas, T., & Judge, W. (2001). Total quality management implementation and competitive advantage: The role of structural control and exploration. Academy of Management Journal, 44 (1), 158–69.

Edmondson, A. C., R. M. J. Bohmer, and G. P. Pisano. 2001. Disrupted routines: Team learning and new technology implementation in hospitals. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46 (4), 685–716.

Ettlie, J. E., & Reza, E. M. (1992). Organizational integration and process innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 35(4), 795-827.

Ferreira, M. P., Serra, F., & Maccari, E. (2012). When the Innovator Fails to Capture Rents From Innovation. Latin American Business Review, 13(3), 199-217.

Frizzo, P., & Gomes, G. (2017). Influência da aprendizagem organizacional e da inovação no desempenho organizacional de empresas do setor vinícola. Revista Ibero-Americana de Estratégia – RIAE, 16(2): 35-50. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5585/riae.v16i2.2429

Guerrazzi, L., Zanin. L., & Falaster, C. (2017). Você diz que quer uma revolução: todos queremos mudar o mundo. Revista Ibero-Americana de Estratégia – RIAE, 16(2), 148-151. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5585/riae.v16i1.2506

Gesser, F. J., Pozzobon, F. R., SILVA, R., & Bonacorso, N. (2007, abril). Desenvolvimento e Construção de uma Fresadora CNC de Baixo Custo Destinada à Confecção de Pranchas de Surf. Anais do Congresso Brasileiro de Engenharia de Fabricação - COBEF, Estância de São Pedro, SP, Brasil, 4.

Hamel, G. (2006). The why, what, and how of management innovation. Harvard business review, 84(2), 72-84.

Harmon, P. (2015). The Scope and Evolution of Business Process Management. In: Brocke, J. vom, & Rosemann, M. (Eds.) Handbook on Business Process Management 1: Introduction, Methods, and Information Systems. 2ª ed. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 37-80.

IBRASURF (2010, maio 12). Portas abertas para o surf como negócio. Acesso em 30 de Julho de 2015, disponível em http://www.fluxexperiences.com.br/portas-abertas-para-o-surf-como-negocio

Kirchmer, M. (2015). Management of Process Excellence. In: Brocke, J. vom, & Rosemann, M. (Eds.) Handbook on Business Process Management 2: Strategic Alignment, Governance, People and Culture. 2ª ed. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 79-99.

Klein, K., Conn, A., & Sorra, J. (2001). Implementing computerized technology: An organizational analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86 (5), 811–24.

Macher, J., & Mowery, D. (2009). Measuring dynamic capabilities: Practices and performance in semiconductor manufacturing. British Journal of Management, 20 (S1), 41–62.

March, J. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71-87.

Marconi, M. A., & Lakatos, E. M. (2011). Metodologia científica (6ª ed.). São Paulo: Atlas.

Martins, G. d., & Theóphilo, C. R. (2009). Metodologia da Investigação Científica para Ciências Sociais Aplicadas. São Paulo: Atlas.

Mathias, L. (2014, março 01). Mercado do surfe motiva surfistas que fabricam pranchas a empreenderem em um negócio próprio. Jornal Notícias do Dia. Acesso em 28 de Julho de 2015, disponível em http://ndonline.com.br/florianopolis/noticias/143459-mercado-do-surf-motiva-surfistas-que-fabricam-pranchas-a-empreenderem-em-um-negocio-proprio.html

McNulty, T., & Ferlie, E. (2004). Process transformation: Limitations to radical organizational change within public service organizations. Organization Studies, 25(8), 1389–1412.

Novack, L. F., & Osiecki, R. (2014). Surfe: uma revisão sistemática. Revista Brasileira de Prescrição e Fisiologia do Exercício - RBPFEX, 8(50), 835-841.

OECD. (1997). Manual de Oslo: Diretrizes para coleta e interpretação de dados sobre inovação. OECD.

O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2004). The ambidextrous organization. Harvard Business Review, 82(4), 74–82.

Piening, E. P., & Salge, T. O. (2015). Understanding the Antecedents, Contingencies, and Performance Implications of Process Innovation: A Dynamic Capabilities Perspective. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(1), 80-97.

Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., Probst, G., & Tushman, M. L. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organization Science, 20(4), 685-695.

Ramos, H., Matos, H., & Mota, E. (2015). O contexto organizacional como elemento de desenvolvimento da ambidesteridade em microempresas. International Journal of Innovation, 3(1): 35-47. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5585/iji.v3i1.45

Reichstein, T., & A. Salter. (2006). Investigating the sources of process innovation among UK manufacturing firms. Industrial and Corporate Change, 15 (4): 653–682.

Serra, F., Fiates, G., & Alperstedt, G. (2007). Inovação na pequena empresa - estudo de caso na Tropical Brasil. Journal of Technology Management Innovation, 2(2): 170-183.

Serra, F., & Ferreira, M. (2016). Cuidados a tomar nos artigos com pesquisa qualitativa. Revista Ibero-Americana de Estratégia – RIAE, 15(4): 1-11. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5585/riae.v15i4.2493

Serra (2017). A importância da pesquisa baseada em fenômenos m Estratégia para os Pesquisadores Iberoamericanos. Revista Ibero-Americana de Estratégia – RIAE, 16(2): 1-3. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5585/ijsm.v16i2.2547

Souza et al. (2010, agosto). Espuma de poliuretano (PU) rígido de alta densidade pós-consumo na fabricação de blocos de vedação de baixo custo para área habitacional. Anais do CONEM - Congresso Nacional de Engenharia Mecânica, Campina Grande, PB, Brasil, 6.

Suárez-Barraza, M. F. (2013). Process Innovation in Local Governments: an empirical study of its continuous improvement efforts. Review of Business Management, 204-220.

Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.

Tushman, M., & O'Reilly, C. (1996). The ambidextrous organization: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38, 1-23.

Un, C. A., & Asakawa, K. (2015). Types of R&D Collaborations and Process Innovation: The Benefit of Collaborating Upstream in the Knowledge Chain. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(1), 138-153.

Yin, R. K. (2010). Estudo de Caso – Planejamento e Métodos. São Paulo: Bookman.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Int. J. Innov. e-ISSN: 2318-9975

Rua Vergueiro, 235/249 - Liberdade, São Paulo - SP (Brasil), Cep: 01504-000

Licença Creative Commons
Este obra está licenciado com uma Licença 
Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-CompartilhaIgual 4.0 Internacional