Factor Analysis On Innovation Inductors In High Performance Organizations

Pedro Carlos Resende Junior, Ricardo Ken Fujihara

Abstract


There are several awards and models of quality and innovation applied around the world. The problem studied is that many organizations present different dimensions and scales for the evaluation of organizational innovation and analysis for the innovative recognition of companies. The article aims to present, through the exploratory and confirmatory factorial analysis, the main inducing factors of organizational innovation in a set of 19 Brazilian companies, from the public and private sectors, with nationally recognized performance. The research integrates the methodology of evaluation of awards, norms and models of innovation - APMNI. The research is characterized as mixed approach (qualitative and quantitative) through data collection with interviews and survey, submitted to content analysis and multivariate statistics. The results indicate that all factorial models (2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 factors) were consistent in light of the statistical analysis. The results indicate that all factorial models (2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 factors) were consistent with statistical analysis. It is concluded that the most adequate explanatory model was the one with four inducing innovation factors: PD&I Management Model; Top Management; Innovation Culture and Innovation Strategies.


Keywords


Innovation; Factor Analysis; Inducing Innovation Factors; PD&I Management Model; Innovation Culture and Innovation Strategies

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bardin, L. (2002). Análise de Conteúdo. Lisboa: Edições 70.

Bentler, P. M. (1990), Comparative Fit Indexes in Structural Models, Psychological Bulletin, 107 (2), 238-46.

Birkinshaw, J., Hamel, G., & Mol, M. (2008). Management innovation. Academy of Management Review, 33 (4), 825-845.

Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, N.J.: Guilford Press.

BSI (1999). BS 7000-1, Design management systems: guide to managing innovation. British Standards Institute, Londres.

BSI (2008). BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION. National Standards. Disponível em:. Acesso: 02 fev. 2016.

Chen, J., Tsou, H. T., & Huang, A. Y. (2009). Service Delivery Innovation: Antecedents and Impact on Firm Performance. Journal of Service Research, 12 (1), 36-55.

Danilevicz, A. D. M. F., & Ribeiro, J. L. D. (2013). Um modelo quantitativo para a gestão da inovação em portfólio de produtos. Gestão e produção, 20(1), 59-75.

Dosi, G. (1982). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories. Research Policy, 11(3), 147-162.

Fife-Schaw, C. (2010). Introdução à modelagem de equação estrutural. In G. M. Breakwell, S. Hammond, C. Fife-Schaw, & J. A. Smith. (Eds.), Métodos de pesquisa em psicologia (pp. 434-453). Porto Alegre, RS: Artmed.

Finch, J. F. & West, SG (1997). The investigation of personality structure: statistical models. Journal of Research in Personality, 31(4), 439-485.

Gallouj, F. (2002). Innovation in the service economy: the new wealth of nations. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Gallouj, F., & Weinstein, O. (1997). Innovation in services. Research Policy, 26(4), 537-556.

Gebauer, H., Krempl, R., Fleisch, E., & Friedli, T. (2008). Innovation of product-related services. Managing Service Quality, 18(4), 387-404.

Hashi, I., & Stojčić, N. (2013). The impact of innovation activities on firm performance using a multi-stage model: Evidence from the Community Innovation Survey 4. Research Policy, 42(2), 353-366.

Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L. & Black, W. C. (2009). Análise multivariada de dados. Porto Alegre: Bookman.

Hernandéz-Nieto, R. A. (2002). Contribuiciones al análisis estatístico. Mérida, Venezuela: Universidad de Los Andes/IESINFO.

Hu, L.T. and Bentler, P.M. (1999), Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives, Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55.

Jong, J. P. J., & Vermeulen, P. A. M. (2003). Organizing successful new service development: a literature review. Management Decision, 41(9), 844-858.

Jöreskog, K. and Sörbom, D. (1993), LISREL 8: Structural Equation Modeling with the SIMPLIS Command Language. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International Inc

Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd edition). New York: The Guilford Press.

Mulaik, S.A., James, L. R., Van Alstine, J., Bennet, N., Lind, S., and Stilwell, C.D. (1989), Evaluation of Goodness-of-Fit Indices for Structural Equation Models, Psychological Bulletin, 105(3), 430-45.

OCDE. (2005). Manual de Oslo. 3ª ed. FINEP/OECD.

Pasquali, L. (2010). Testes referentes a construto: teoria e modelo de construção. Em L. Pasquali & cols. (Orgs.), Instrumentação psicológica: fundamentos e práticas. Porto Alegre: Artmed.

Resende Junior, P. C.; Fujihara, R. K. (2015). Meta-Metodologia de Avaliação de Modelo de Inovação. In: Vasconcelos, M. (Org.) Gestão da Inovação. 1ª ed. São Paulo: Fundação Nacional da Qualidade, v. 1, p. 163-183.

Resende Junior, P. C.; Oliveira, A. R.; Fujihara, R. K. (2015). Driving Factors of Organizational Innovation. In: 2015 International Academic Business Conference, Las Vegas. 2015 International Academic Business Conference - Proceedings. Las Vegas: Clute, 2015. v. 1. p. 229-1-229-15.

Resende Junior, P. C., Pinheiro, S. B., Valeri, S. (2015). Os prêmios de inovação como instrumentos de gestão da inovação. In: Marcos Vasconcellos. (Org.). Gestão da Inovação. 1ª ed. São Paulo: Fundação Nacional da Qualidade, v. 1, p. 143-161.

Schumpeter, J. (1997). A teoria do desenvolvimento econômico. São Paulo: Nova Cultural.

Sharma, S., Mukherjee, S., Kumar, A., and Dillon, W.R. (2005), A simulation study to investigate the use of cutoff values for assessing model fit in covariance structure models, Journal of Business Research, 58(1), 935-43.

Tabachnick, B. G. and Fidell, L. S. (2007), Using Multivariate Statistics (5th ed.). New York: Allyn and Bacon.

Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: understanding concepts and applications. Washington: American Psychological Association.

Wheaton, B., Muthen, B., Alwin, D., F., and Summers, G. (1977), Assessing Reliability and Stability in Panel Models, Sociological Methodology, 8(1), 84-136.

Zhou, K. Z., Yim, C. K., & Tse, D. K. (2005). The effects of strategic orientations on technology- and market-based breakthrough innovations. Journal Mark, 69, 42-60.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Int. J. Innov. e-ISSN: 2318-9975

Rua Vergueiro, 235/249 - Liberdade, São Paulo - SP (Brasil), Cep: 01504-000

 Licença Creative Commons

Este obra está licenciado com uma Licença Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional.