How Technology Intelligence is Applied In Different Contexts?

Leandro Rodrigues Gonçalves, Fernando Carvalho de Almeida

Abstract


Technology Intelligence is one of the many ways of applying Competitive Intelligence. As CI, TI intends to detect and process weak signals in order to identify opportunities and threats and provide actionable information. There is still a gap in reported cases of companies actually applying Technology Intelligence. This article intends to answer the research question: How companies build an actionable technology intelligence project? Case Study and Action-research approaches were applied for this research. The article describes two application cases: a research institute with a petrochemical industry as a client; and a private petrochemical industry. Companies seem to not know how to deal with Technology Intelligence. When outsourcing, they are more willing to pay for an extremely comprehensive project that not necessarily needs to be so deep and complex. When doing it internally, decision makers are not willing to wait and give the TI analysts resources to conduct a project in the right deepness and complexity. It seems like a “goldilocks problem” applied to Technology Intelligence.


Keywords


Technology Intelligence; Technical Competitive Intelligence; Weak signals; Innovation management

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ansoff, H. I. (1975). Managing Strategic Surprise by Response to Weak Signals. California Management Review, XVIII(2), 21–33. http://doi.org/citeulike-article-id:1109593

Castellanos, O. F., & Torres, L. M. (2010). Technology intelligence: Methods and capabilities for generation of knowledge and decision making. PICMET ’10 - Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology, Proceedings - Technology Management for Global Economic Growth, 1176–1184.

Choo, C. W. (2001). Environmental scanning as information seeking and organizational learning. Information Research, 7(1), 1–37.

Christensen, C. (1997). Innovator’s Dilemma: when new technologies cause great firms to fall.

Cooper, A. C., & Schendel, D. (1976). Strategic responses to technological threats. Business Horizons, 19(1), 61–69. http://doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(76)90024-0

Coughlan, P., & Coghlan, D. (2002). Action research for operations management. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 22(2), 220–240. http://doi.org/10.1108/01443570210417515

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.

Herring, J. P. (1999). Key intelligence topics: A process to identify and define intelligence needs. Competitive Intelligence Review, 10(2), 4–14. http://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6386(199932)10:2<4::AID-CIR3>3.3.CO;2-3

Ittipanuvat, V., Fujita, K., Sakata, I., & Kajikawa, Y. (2014). Finding linkage between technology and social issue: A Literature Based Discovery approach. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management - JET-M, 32, 160–184. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2013.05.006

Joung, J., & Kim, K. (2017). Monitoring emerging technologies for technology planning using technical keyword based analysis from patent data. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 281–292. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.020

Kim, J., Hwang, M., Jeong, D.-H., & Jung, H. (2012). Technology trends analysis and forecasting application based on decision tree and statistical feature analysis. Expert Systems With Applications, 39(16), 12618–12625. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.05.021

Lichtenthaler, E. (2003). Third generation management of technology intelligence processes. R&D Management, 33(4), 361–375. http://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9310.00304

Lichtenthaler, E. (2004). Technological change and the technology intelligence process: A case study. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management - JET-M, 21(4), 331–348. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2004.09.003

Lichtenthaler, E. (2007). Managing technology intelligence processes in situations of radical technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74(8), 1109–1136. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2006.10.001

Miller, S. H. (2002). Prefácio. In J. E. Prescott & S. H. Miller (Eds.), Inteligência competitiva na prática: técnicas e práticas bem-sucedidas para conquistar mercados (1st ed., pp. 11–15). Rio de Janeiro: Campus.

Momeni, A., & Rost, K. (2016). Identification and monitoring of possible disruptive technologies by patent-development paths and topic modeling. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 104. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.12.003

Mortara, L. (2011). Communicating Technology: A practical Guide.

Nikolaos, T., & Evangelia, F. (2012). Competitive intelligence: concept , context and a case of its application. Science Journal of Business Management, (2), 1–15.

Nosella, A., Petroni, G., & Salandra, R. (2008). Technological change and technology monitoring process : Evidence from four Italian case studies. Journal of Engineering and Technology ManagementTechnology Management, 25, 321–337. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2008.10.001

Pellissier, R., & Nenzhelele, T. E. (2013). Towards a universal definition of competitive intelligence. SA Journal of Information Management, 15(2), 1–7. http://doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v15i2.559

Prescott, J. E., & Miller, S. H. (2002). Inteligência Competitiva Técnica. In J. E. Prescott & S. E. Miller (Eds.), Inteligência competitiva na prática: técnicas e práticas bem-sucedidas para conquistar mercados (1st ed., pp. 293–294). Rio de Janeiro: Campus. http://doi.org/85-352-0892-5

Ransley, D. L. (1996). Benchmarking the “external technology watching” process: Chevron’s experience. Competitive Intelligence Review, 7(3), 28–33. http://doi.org/10.1002/cir.3880070307

Rau, D., & Haerem, T. (2010). Applying an organizational learning perspective to new technology deployment by technological gatekeepers: A theoretical model and key issues for future research. Information Systems Frontiers, 12(3), 287–297. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-009-9194-8

Rossel, P. (2012). Early detection, warnings, weak signals and seeds of change: A turbulent domain of futures studies. Futures, 44(3), 229–239. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2011.10.005

Schuh, G., & Grawatsch, M. (2004). TRIZ-based technology intelligence. Triz Journal.

Tessun, F. (2002). Análise de cenários e sistemas de advertência antecipada na Daimler-Benz Aerospace. In J. E.

Prescott & S. H. Miller (Eds.), Inteligência competitiva na prática: estudos de casos diretamente do campo de batalha. (1st ed., pp. 295–306). Rio de Janeiro: Campus.

Theóphilo, C., & Martins, G. (2009). Metodologia da investigação científica para ciências sociais aplicadas. São Paulo: Atlas.

Veugelers, M., Bury, J., & Viaene, S. (2010). Linking technology intelligence to open innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77(2), 335–343. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2009.09.003

Wancura, H., Montignac, F., Mazzucchi, C., Spirig, M., & Costa, J. B. e. (2013). Creating a Solid Base for Technology Road Mapping Using an Integrated Technology Monitoring and Assessment Tool. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 75, 370–382. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.04.042

Yin, R. K. (2015). Estudo de Caso: Planejamento e Métodos (4a ed.). Porto Alegre: Bookman editora.

Yoon, B. (2008). On the development of a technology intelligence tool for identifying technology opportunity. Expert Systems with Applications, 35(1–2), 124–135. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.06.022

Yoon, J., Park, H., Seo, W., Lee, J. M., Coh, B. youl, & Kim, J. (2015). Technology opportunity discovery (TOD) from existing technologies and products: A function-based TOD framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 100. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.04.012


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Int. J. Innov. e-ISSN: 2318-9975

Rua Vergueiro, 235/249 - Liberdade, São Paulo - SP (Brasil), Cep: 01504-000

Licença Creative Commons
Este obra está licenciado com uma Licença 
Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-CompartilhaIgual 4.0 Internacional