Measuring Non Monetary Innovation In Software: a case study in floss firms from Argentina

Jorge Motta, Hernán Alejandro Morero, Carina Borrastero

Abstract


This paper presents a critical review of the design of innovation surveys that follow the Oslo Manual standards, based on a series of case studies in Free/Libre Open Source Software (FLOSS) companies. The main objective of the paper is to contribute to identify the specificities of innovation in FLOSS firms that traditional innovation surveys usually omit, to improve current innovation measures and metrics in the software sector. We applied a qualitative analysis based on seven case studies in FLOSS firms from Argentina, mainly through semi-structured interviews to key informants. Such analysis was aimed to elucidate the nature and particularities of the innovation processes and outcomes in the firms, the characteristics of the collaboration with the community and its role in the business model and innovation strategy of the organizations.


Keywords


Non Monetary Innovation; FLOSS firms; Innovation Surveys; Case study; Argentina

Full Text:

PDF

References


Borello, J., Erbes, A., Robert, V., Roitter, S., & Yoguel, G. (2005). Competencias técnicas de los trabajadores informáticos. El caso de Argentina. Revista de la CEPAL(87), 131-150.

Borello, J., Robert, V., & Yoguel, G. (Eds.). (2006). La informática en la Argentina: Prometeo-UNGS.

Capra, E., Francalanci, C., Merlo, F., & Rossi-Lamastra, C. (2011). Firms’ involvement in Open Source projects: A trade-off between software structural quality and popularity. Journal of Systems and Software, 84(1), 144-161. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2010.09.004

Colombo, M. G., Piva, E., & Rossi-Lamastra, C. (2013). Authorising Employees to Collaborate with Communities During Working Hours: When is it Valuable for Firms? Long Range Planning, 46(3), 236-257. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2012.05.004

Colombo, M. G., Piva, E., & Rossi-Lamastra, C. (2014). Open innovation and within-industry diversification in small and medium enterprises: The case of open source software firms. Research policy, 43(5), 891-902. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.08.015

Conklin, M. (2007). Motives and Methods for Quantitative FLOSS Research. In K. Amant & B. Still (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Open Source Software: Technological, Economic, and Social Perspectives (pp. 282). NY, US: Information Science Reference.

Dahlander, L., & Magnusson, M. G. (2005). Relationships between open source software companies and communities: Observations from Nordic firms. Research Policy, 34(4), 481-493. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.02.003

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2005). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.): Sage.

Dosi, G., Freeman, C., Nelson, R., Silverberg, G., & Soete, L. (1988). Technical change and economic theory (Vol. 988): Pinter London.

Dutrénit, G., & Sutz, J. (2014). Sistemas de innovación para un desarrollo inclusivo: La experiencia latinoamericana. México, DF: LALICS/Edward Elgar Publishing.

Dutrénit, G., & Zúñiga, P. (2013). Políticas de ciencia, tecnología e innovación para el desarrollo. La experiencia latinoamericana. México, DF: LALICS.

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of management review, 14(4), 532-550.

Freeman, C., & Soete, L. (1997). The economics of industrial innovation, 3rd ed. London: Pinter.

Gallouj, F., & Savona, M. (2009). Innovation in services: a review of the debate and a research agenda. Journal of evolutionary economics, 19(2), 149-172.

Gallouj, F., & Weinstein, O. (1997). Innovation in services. Research Policy, 26(4), 537-556.

Ghosh, R. A. (2003). Clustering and dependencies in free/open source software development: Methodology and tools. First Monday, 8(4).

Jaramillo, H., Lugones, G., & Salazar, M. (2001). Manual de Bogotá. Normalización de indicadores de innovación tecnológica en América Latina y el Caribe. . Bogotá: Colciencias.

Kogut, B., & Metiu, A. (2001). Open‐source software development and distributed innovation. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 17(2), 248-264.

Lakhani, K., Wolf, B., Bates, J., & DiBona, C. (2002). The boston consulting group hacker survey. Boston, The Boston Consulting Group.

LALICS. (2012). Declaración LALICS (Latin American Network on Learning, Innovation and Competence Building). Aportes desde la Ciencia, la Tecnología y la Innovación a la Inclusión Social. Paper presented at the Seminario LALICS-CSIC, Montevideo.

Lam, A. (2005). Organizational Innovation. . In J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery & R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. UK: The Oxford Handbook of Innovation.

Lee, G. K., & Cole, R. E. (2003). From a firm-based to a community-based model of knowledge creation: The case of the Linux kernel development. Organization science, 14(6), 633-649.

Lundvall, B. Å. (Ed.). (1992). National Systems of Innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Printer Ed. / 1º edición en español en mayo de 2009, por UNSAM Edita

MERIT, U. (2007). Final Research Report and Policy Impact.

Moncaut, N., & Robert, V. (2016). Determinantes del uso y desarrollo de software libre en Argentina. Paper presented at the XXI Red Pymes Mercosur, Tandil.

Nelson, R., & Winter, S. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change: Harvard University Press.

O’Mahony, S. (2003). Guarding the commons: how community managed software projects protect their work. Research Policy, 32(7), 1179-1198. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00048-9

OCDE. (2005). Manual de Oslo. Guía para la recogida e interpretación de datos sobre innovación. Luxembourg: OCDE.

Raymond, E. (1999). The cathedral and the bazaar. Musings on Linux and Open Source by an Accidental Revolutionary. US: O'Reillly.

Robert, V. (2006). Límites y efectos de la difusión de software libre en un país en desarrollo. El caso de la Argentina. In J. Borello, V. Robert & G. Yoguel (Eds.), La informática en la Argentina (pp. 205-228). Buenos Aires: Prometeo-UNGS.

Robles, G., Scheider, H., Tretkowski, I., & Weber, N. (2001). Who is doing it? A research on libre software developers. Research Paper, TU Berlin, August.

Salazar, M. (2015). Twenty years of innovation measurement in Latin-american countries: lessons learned. Keynote speech presented in the 13th Globelics International Conference, La Havana.

Schumpeter, J. A. (1911). The theory of economic development. An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle: Transaction Publishers.

Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Socialism, capitalism and democracy: Harper and Brothers.

Solow, R. M. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. The quarterly journal of economics, 70(1), 65-94.

Solow, R. M. (1957). Technical change and the aggregate production function. The review of Economics and Statistics, 312-320.

Stallman, R. (1983). El manifiesto GNU. El manifiesto de GNU.

UNU MERIT, & Berlecon Research. (2002). FLOSS FINAL REPORT. The Netherlands: European Commission.

Von Grogh, G. (2003). Open-source software development. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(3), 14-18.

von Hippel, E., & von Krogh, G. (2009). Open Source Software and the “Private-Collective” Innovation Model: Issues for Organization Science. MIT Sloan School WP 4738-09.

Von Hippel, E. A. (2005). Democratizing innovation. Cambridge, Mass; London, GB: MIT Press.

West, J., & O'Mahony, S. (2008). The role of participation architecture in growing sponsored open source communities. Industry and innovation, 15(2), 145-168.

Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (Vol. 5): Sage.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Int. J. Innov. e-ISSN: 2318-9975

Rua Vergueiro, 235/249 - Liberdade, São Paulo - SP (Brasil), Cep: 01504-000

Licença Creative Commons
Este obra está licenciado com uma Licença 
Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-CompartilhaIgual 4.0 Internacional