Marketing communications model for innovation networks

Tiago João Freitas Correia, Américo Mateus, Susana Leonor


Innovation is an increasingly relevant concept for the success of any organization, but it also represents a set of internal and external considerations, barriers and challenges to overcome. Along the concept of innovation, new paradigms emerge such as open innovation and co-creation that are simultaneously innovation modifiers and intensifiers in organizations, promoting organizational openness and stakeholder integration within the value creation process. Innovation networks composed by a multiplicity of agents in co-creative work perform as innovation mechanisms to face the increasingly complexity of products, services and markets. Technology, especially the Internet, is an enabler of all process among organizations supported by co-creative platforms for innovation. The definition of marketing communication strategies that promote motivation and involvement of all stakeholders in synergic creation and external promotion is the central aspect of this research. The implementation of the projects is performed by participative workshops with stakeholders from Madan Parque through IDEAS(R)EVOLUTION methodology and the operational model LinkUp parameterized for the project. The project is divided into the first part, the theoretical framework, and the second part where a model is developed for the marketing communication strategies that appeal to the Madan Parque case study. 

Keywords: Marketing Communication; Open Innovation, Technology; Innovation Networks; Incubator; Co-Creation.


Marketing Communication; Open Innovation; Technology; Innovation Networks; Incubator; Co-Creation

Full Text:



Acs, Z., & Audretsch, D. (1990). Innovation and small firms. Boston, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

Aerts, K., Matthyssens, P., & Vandenbempt, K. (2007). Critical role and screening practices of European business incubators. Technovation, 5(27), 254-267.

Artz, K., Norman, P., Hatfield, D., & Cardinal, L. (2010). A Longitudinal Study of the Impact of R&D, Patents, and Product Innovation of Firm Performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 725-740.

Bergek, A., & Norman, C. (2008). Incubator best practice: A framework. Technovation, 28(1), 20-28.

Burrone, E., & Jaiya, G. (2005). Intellectual Property (IP) Rights and Innovation in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises. Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organization.

Cassiman, B., & Veugelers, R. (2006). In Search of Complementary in Innovation Strategy: Internal R&D and External Knowledge Acquisition. Management Science, 52(1), 68-82.

Catozzella, A., & Vivarelli, M. (2007). The catalyzing role of in-house R&D in fostering the complementary of innovative inputs. IZA Discussion Papers, No. 3126.

Chesbrough, H. (2003a). The era of open innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(3), pp. 35-41.

Chesbrough, H. W. (2003b). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business Press.

Chesbrough, H. (2011). Bringing open innovation to services. MIT Sloan Management Review, 52(2), 85-90.

Diehl, J., Toombs, L., & Maniam, B. (2013). Small and Medium Sized Enterprises in the Global Economy. Journal of American Academy of Business, 19(1), 45-51.

Drucker, P. (1997). Innovation and entrepreneurship: Practice and

principles. England: Butterworth-Heinemann.

Duarte, V., & Sarkar, S. (2011). Separating the wheat from the chaff – a taxonomy of open innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 14(4), pp. 435-459.

Dyer, J., Gregersen, H., & Christensen, C. (2011). The Innovator's DNA: Mastering the Five Skills of Disruptive Innovators. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business Press Books.

Edwards, T., Delbridge, R., & Munday, M. (2005, October). Understanding innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises: a process manifest. Technovation, 25(10), 1119-1127.

Eisenhardt, K. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550.

European Commission. (2008, June 25). Comunicação da comissão ao parlamento europeu, ao conselho, ao comité económico e social europeu e ao comité das regiões. «Think Small First» Um «Small Business Act» para a Europa . Bruxelas: COM(2008) 394 final.

European Commission. (2010). Communication from the commission EUROPE 2020. A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. Brussels: COM (2010) 2020 final.

Freeman, C., & Soete, L. (1997). The Economics of Industrial Innovation. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Gerring, J. (2004). What Is a Case Study and What Is It Good for? American Political Science Review, 341-354.

Gorodnichenko, Y., Svejnar, J., & Terrell, K. (2010, Janeiro 1). Globalization and innovation in emerging markets. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 2, 194-226.

Guba, E., & Lincoln , Y. (1984). Qualitative data analysis: a sourcebook of new methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Hagedoorn, J., & Wang, N. (2012). Is there complementarity or substitutability between internal and external R&D strategies? Research Policy, 41(6), 1072-1083.

Hall, B., Lotti, F., & Mairesse, J. (2009). Innovation and productivity in SMEs: empirical evidence for Italy. Small Business Economics, 33(1), 13-33.

Hippel, E. V. (1986). Lead users: a source of novel product concepts. Management Science, 32(7), pp. 791-805.

Hippel, E. V. (2001). User Toolkits for Innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18(4), 247-257.

Hippel, E. V. (2005). Democratizing Innovation. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

Karlsson, M. (2010). Collaborative Idea Management - Using the creativity of crowds to drive innovation. Applied Innovation Management, 1-26. Retrieved February 3, 2014, from Innovation Management:

Kathryn, B. (2010). Gestão de design: Gerir a estratégia, os processos e a implementação do design. Diverge.

Kotler, P., & Keller, K. (2012). Marketing Management. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Kotler, P., Kartajaya, H., & Setiawan, I. (2010). Marketing 3.0: From Products to Costumers to the Human Spirit. Hoboken, New Jersey.: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Lee, S., Park, G., Yoon, B., & Park, J. (2010, Janeiro). Open innovation in Sme's - An intermediated network model. Research Policy, pp. 290-300.

Lindon, D., Freitas, L., Lendervie, J., Lévy, J., Dionísio, P., & Rodrigues, J. V. (2004). Mercator XXI - Teoria e Prática do Marketing. Lisboa: Dom Quixote.

Lundvall, B.-Å. (1992). National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter Publishers.

Mateus, A., Rosa, C. A., Gomez, L. R., & Leonor, S. (2012a). Oeste Ativo Ecosystem for Innovation: a regional business regeneration program through the design thinking based methodology IDEAS(R)EVOLUTION - a Co-creative way of thinking brands and integrated innovation. Proceedings CUMULUS conference, (pp. 139-148). Santiago, Chile.

Mateus, A., Rosa, C. A., Leonor, S., & Loureiro, A. L. (2012b, June 30). PPEC 2011-2012: Medida "Painel de consumidores em redes inteligentes". User Centered Innovation Program - Diagnóstico, Co-criação, Estratégia e Experimentação. Évora, Évora, Portugal.

Merriam, S. (1988). Case study research in education: a qualitative approach.

Mustar, P., Wright, M., & Clarysse, B. (2008). University spin-off firms: Lessons from ten years of experience in Europe. Science and Public Policy(35(2)), 67-80.

Narula, R. (2004). R&D collaboration by SMEs: new opportunities and

limitations in the face of globalization. Technovation, 24(2), 153-161.

OECD. (2005). Oslo Manual: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data. Paris, France: OECD PUBLICATIONS.

Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. California: Sage Publications.

Pfeffermann, N. (2011). Innovation Communication as a Cross-Functional Dynamic Capability: Strategies for Organizations and Networks. In M. Hülsmann, & N. Pfeffermann, Strategies and Communications for Innovations: An Integrative Management View for Companies and Networks (pp. 257-289). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Porter, M. (1990, Março). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. Retrieved from Harvard Business Review:

Prahalad, C., & Ramaswamy, V. (2000). Co-opting Customer Competence. Harvard Business Review, 78(1), 79-90.

Prahalad, C., & Ramaswamy, V. (2002). The co-creation connection. Strategy and Business, pp. 50-61.

Prahalad, C., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004a). The future of competition: Co-creating unique value with customers. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press.

Prahalad, C., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004b). Co-Creation Experiences: The

Next Practice in Value Creation. Journal of interactive marketing, 18(3), pp. 5-14.

Schumpeter, J. (1947). The creative response in economic history.

Journal of Economic History, 140-159.

Shane, S. (2004). Academic Entrepreneurship: University spinoffs and wealth creation. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.

Skarzynski, P., & Gibson, R. (2008). Innovation to the Core: A Blueprint for Transforming the Way Your Company. Boston, Massachussets: Harvard Business Press.

Tamasy, C. (2007). Rethinking Technology‐Oriented Business Incubators: Developing a Robust Policy Instrument for Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Regional Development? Growth and Change, 3( 38), 460-473.

West, J. (2006). Does appropriability enable or retard open innovation? In H. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke, & J. West, Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm (pp. 109-133). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Wilson, B. (1984). Systems: Concepts, Methodologies and Applications. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Wymenga, P., Spanikova, V., Barker, A., Konings, J., & Canton, E. (2012, September). EU SMEs in 2012: at the crossroads: Annual report on small and medium-sized enterprises in the EU, 2011/12. Retrieved from SME Performance Review:

Yin, R. (1984). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. London: Sage.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Int. J. Innov. e-ISSN: 2318-9975

Rua Vergueiro, 235/249 - Liberdade, São Paulo - SP (Brasil), Cep: 01504-000

Licença Creative Commons
Este obra está licenciado com uma Licença 
Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-CompartilhaIgual 4.0 Internacional